Saturday, January 26, 2013

Signing Delmon Young is a Huge Mistake; The Phils Should Sign Michael Bourn Instead

Signing Delmon Young is a Huge Mistake: the Phillies should Sign Michael Bourn Instead and Get Rid of Delmon Young and Dominic Brown


Like a lot of others, I’ve crunched the numbers on all of the phillies off-season moves, and the bottom line on the Delmon Young signing is that it’s probably a bad mistake. Delmon Young is such a bad fielder that even if he hits well, his most likely WAR contribution will be @ .1, because his bad glove will completely cancel out his offensive contributions. Compare that to Hunter Pence, who had ..7 WAR in 101 G, or on pace to be 1.0 WAR–at least he wasn’t hurting you.
The actual best move for the Phillies would be to sign the still available Mike Bourn, who was first in the NL in Defensive WAR, and had a 6.0 WAR overall, and have him play CF. They should then have Ben Revere play RF fulltime, because Revere is a defensive demon. If Bourn plays CF and Revere plays RF, then we can expect 4.47 WAR from Bourn in CF and 2.90 WAR from Revere in RF, most of that being defensive. It won’t even matter if they hit.


Michael Bourn started out as a homegrown Phillie.  He was traded for Brad Lidge.  Now is the time to bring him back home.  If we put him in CF and Ben Revere in RF, we would be able to win the NL East.  

Compare that to 1.3 WAR from Victorino and .7 WAR from Pence in 101 G each last year, and you immediately see a huge upgrade–it would be 7.37 wins in lieu of 2 wins, or an instant improvement of nearly 5.5 wins over last years OF. Then I would probably get rid of Dominic Brown and Delmon Young, who can’t play defense–Dom Brown has a career minus 1.8 WAR in 147 G–and instead play Lance Nix in LF together with Mayberry and Ruf. Mayberry has averaged a win share per 150 games, while Ruf hit 40 HR last year and accumulated .3 WS in just 12 games–that projects to 3.0 win shares in 120 games. If you platooned Nix and Ruf, you might expect to get as many as 1.2 win shares from Nix and 3.0 win shares from Ruf. That would be 4.2 win shares, compared to the 1.9 win shares you got from Juan Pierre. Overall, that’s a better OF. You’d have overall 7 more wins from your OF.

It's difficult to believe that the Phillies have entirely ignored the developments in understanding the contributions of WAR, Defense and Glovework to wins and to marginal wins which have been worked out the past few years.  Why sign a guy as good as Ben Revere, and then sign someone as horrible as Delmon Young to play beside him?  Delmon Young routinely fields so badly that no matter how well he hits, his defense cancels out his offense, WAR wise.  Consequently, it is literally a fruitless exercise to play him anywhere but DH.  You would think the Phils would have learned this from the Ty Wigginton exercise last year--watching Wiggington butcher balls at 3B last year was painful.  We saw better fielding in college and beer league softball games. 

Let's give credit where credit is due.  Getting rid of BJ Rosenberg, Lindblom, Qualls, Blanton, Contreras, Stutes and Diekman, as well as Blanton, Victorino, Pence and Schierholz, was a kind of addition by subtraction.  We'll miss Juan Pierre a little, but that's life.  Mike Adams is a fine pickup, and Ben Revere was a great signing.  Mike Young is 100% ballplayer and zero percent BS.  Not a great glove either, but he hits a ton--and has a batting title to prove it.  


Michael Young Signs with the Phillies.


And he doesn't get drunk and hurl racial and anti semitic slurs at folks either.  Acquiring a known anti-semite is, one has to think, a bit distasteful for this organization, considering the enormous size, influence, stature, respect,  and historic nature of the Philadelphia Jewish-American Comunity, dating back as it does to Haym Solomon and the Revolutionary War.  Most of us will have a hard time accepting Delmon Young knowing the kind of things he has said in the past.   Hate speech of any kind cannot be tolerated in this society.  
On the IF, Ruiz will go down a little, but has an established level of 3.6 WAR. Kratz will double to 2.8 WAR if he gets into 100 G. Howard at 1B should return to @ 1.83 WAR; Utley’s established WAR is 5.8 and he should improve over last seasons 2.9 in 1/2 a season. Rollins will stay round his 2.3 WAR. Polanco and Frandsen’s 1.8 WAR were cancelled by Wigginton’s minus 1.7 WAR for a net .1 WAR. Mike Young has a great bat but a bad glove, but he will give us a net .5 WAR, so we’ll improve there. And, we lose michael martinez and get Freddie Galvis for the whole year, which means Galvis’ glove adds another 1/2 to a whole win share, mainly on defense, assuming he rests Utley, Rollins or Young a fair amount. Overall, the Phils can pick up 10 win shares on offense without Bourn, but can pick up 15 with Bourn.
On the pitching side, getting rid of all the bad bullpen guys will save the Phils 3 WAR on pitching, and Mike Adams gives them 1.3 WAR, so the bullpen will improve 4.1 WAR, plus Papelbon actually has an established level of 2.2, not 1.6 WAR, so the bullpen can go to 4.6 WAR. Hamels and Lee can slightly improve by 1/2 WAR each, Kendrick will be about the same, John Lannan will be better than Blanton or Worley, or at least a wash, and then Halladay has an established WAR of 6.9 WAR, whereas he only gave us .7 last year. His career average dropping high and low is 4.2. Assuming all this, the Pitching Staff should improve by 11 WAR to 12 WAR.
Last year the Phils were 15 WAR batting, 10 WAR pitching; adding 43 to this gave them a predicted wins of 69, whereas they actually won 81.
This analysis without Bourn gives them a 26 WAR batting, 22 WAR pitching, for 48 WAR, which if you add 43, using a WAR to wins conversion formula for 2012, gives them a predicted win total of 91 wins. If you add Bourn to this mix and eliminate Young and Brown, and move Bourn to CF and move Revere to RF and go with the Defensive Package in the OF, then you move to 31 batting and defense, and you eliminate two potential minuses in Brown and Young–moving the Phils to a predicted 96 win season.
At this juncture its safe to say, if the pitching holds up, and here we mean Halladay, the Phils will challenge again for the NL East crown.
Ruben Amaro should pull the trigger on the Michael Bourn signing. Its the key to another NL East crown.  It's the one move he hasn't made, that he should make.  He can trade Delmon Young and Dominic Brown to the AL, where they can DH, as they should, and obtain future prospects or additional bullpen help.   What he should not do is consider playing Dom Brown or Delmon Young in the OF--they are butchers in the field.  Nor are they good hitters--Delmon Young doesn't walk, and Dom Brown is just not that good a hitter to justify his dreadful glove.  

There's an old saying in baseball--the late Earl Weaver liked it.  It was "pitching, power and defense win championships".  The Phillies should heed this.  They have the power in the INF.  The best thing they can do with their OF, is populate it with speedsters who can catch the ball--like the 1980 Phils did with Bake McBride and Garry Maddox.  That's what Ben Revere and Michael Bourn would be like in CF and RF for the Phils.
Art Kyriazis, Philly

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Harbaugh v. Harbaugh - Ravens v. 49ers in Super Bowl 47


Harbaugh v. Harbaugh - Ravens v. 49ers in Super Bowl 47

Last Weeks Picks

Well, you hate to toot your own horn, but both the Niners and the Ravens were road dogs last weekend, and the Ravens were HUGE road dogs.

Nonetheless, yours truly went out on a huge limb and picked both the Niners and the Ravens to win last weekend.  We said that the Niners would win despite their weakness at kicker (David Akers did miss a critical field goal) because they were slightly stronger on defense than the Falcons, and they showed this by shutting down the Falcons completely in the second half.  We also said that the Ravens and Ray Lewis were going to shut down New England based on their prior matchups, and that Baltimore was the one team in the league that New England hated to play, especially in the playoffs.  While that game was close in the first half, in the second half Baltimore not only shut the Pats down, they pulled away and it was not very close at all in the final analysis.  

This now makes our post season picks 3-1 wild card weekend, 3-1 divisional weekend, and 2-0 NFC/AFC championship weekend, for an overall record of 8-2 to date.  

If you weight it by round, it goes something like this:

wild card 1 point   3-1 3 - 1  
 3 -  1 total

divisional 3 points  3-1 9 - 3 
12 - 4 total

AFC/NFC 5 points 2-0 10-0 
22 - 4 total.

Anyway you cut it, we're doing pretty good.  
So good, we may never try this again.

Win, we're 9-2, lose we're 8-3, so at this point we're playing with house money in the "HarBowl" of Harbaugh v. Harbaugh.  

John Harbaugh was a Special Teams Coach for years with the Philadelphia Eagles and Coach Andy Reid.  It's too bad that Owner Jeffrey Lurie didn't hire John Harbaugh as our Head Coach back in 2008 since that's about the time Reid started going downhill and John Harbaugh became the best coach in the NFL.  Also, John Harbaugh only needs to buy one seat when he flies coach on a commercial flight.  When Andy Reid sits around the house, he sits around the house.
  

Super Bowl Pick

Let's start with the stats.  These two teams scored approximately the same number of points, but SF allowed fewer points.  Balanced against that is the obvious fact that the Niners played in a ridiculously easier division and against a much easier schedule than did the Ravens, and that the Niners clearly had a much easier path to the Super Bowl than did the Ravens.

The Ravens play in the AFC North, one of the toughest divisions in the NFL, plus they had as their interdivisional scheduled rival this year, the NFC East, which meant they also had to play the Cowboys, Eagles, Redskins and NY Giants on top of playing the Steelers and Bengals twice each, and having the Pats on their schedule as well.  The Ravens lost to the Eagles early, to the Bengals, the Steelers, the Texans and the Broncos.  Except for the Eagles and Steelers, those were all playoff teams, and the Eagles and Steelers have been in the playoffs most of the past few years, plus Ray Lewis was hurt during those losses.

The Ravens in getting to the Super Bowl have beaten the Colts at home, Denver on the road, and the Pats on the road.  In doing so they became the first team since the 2010 NY Jets to defeat Peyton Manning and Tom Brady in the same set of playoffs to get to the Super Bowl.  

The 49ers are not shabby by any means.  They lost to the Rams, and tied the Rams, and lost to the NY Giants, the Vikings and the Seahawks.  The Rams were actually in the hunt most of the year, and so were the Giants, and the Vikings and the Seahawks were legit playoff teams.  In getting to the Super Bowl, the 49ers won very tough games against the Packers at home and against the top seeded Atlanta Falcons on the road, coming back from 17 points down to beat Atlanta 28-24.

Our pick here is BALTIMORE RAVENS.

This rests on three principal factors.

First, the coaches.  While Jim and John Harbaugh are brothers, the similarities sort of end there.  John Harbaugh has been coaching in the NFL since the 1990s.  He was a special teams coach with the Eagles and worked for Ray Rhodes before he worked with Andy Reid.  Ray Rhodes, in case people forget, was a defensive minded coach who got to the playoffs and once beat Detroit something like 50-0 in a playoff game.  We once played behind Ray's group in the annual scramble tournament on one of Ron Jaworski's courses for the Maxwell Club charity golf tourney, and Ray was just as intense about golf as he was about coaching, scowling about missing putts.   Ray Rhodes was the defensive coordinator for the 1994 SF 49ers who won the Super Bowl with Steve Young, and that team was among the league leaders in team defense; and then Rhodes went 10-6 his first two years with the Eagles.  Among the brilliant minds Rhodes hired was Jon Gruden as his offensive coordinator, and John Harbaugh as his special teams coach.  You can't really blame Ray Rhodes for his last couple of years in Philly when he was forced to play guys like Ty Detmer and Bobby Hoying at QB, who were pretty dreadful, especially Hoying, who can only remind you of Nick Foles and vice versa in his all around terrible play and simple inability to see what's going on in an NFL game, although one could be wrong about Foles, it does not seem likely he will ever be a very good NFL QB.

John Harbaugh since leaving the Eagles nest for the Ravens nest, has been the single most impressive coach in the NFL since  2008.  He has always had a winning record, he has never missed the playoffs, and he has an 8-4 overall playoff record in that time period.  

By comparison, Bill Belichick of the NE Pats, missed the playoffs in 2008, and has been 3-4 in the playoffs the other years he actually made it.  Advantage:  Harbaugh over Belichick.  When you include last weekends smackdown of the Pats by Harbaugh's Ravens, well, you get the idea.  

Fact is, there has been a huge changing of the guard in the NFL; John Harbaugh is now the best coach in the NFL.  

Baltimore Ravens Coach John Harbaugh after pummeling the NE Patriots to win the AFC Championship


What has eluded John Harbaugh to date is what Tom Coughlin and others have:  the Super Bowl Championship. (To be fair, Coughlin has won twice, but then again, he has Eli Manning). John Harbaugh burns with a desire to win the Super Bowl, and the rest of his team burns to win it as well.

If any other coach in the league had Joe Flacco as his QB, would they be 8-4 in the playoffs?  See?  John Harbaugh is a genius.  It's easy to win if your QB is Tom Brady.  But winning with Joe Flacco is a whole other deal.  That takes SKILL.

Jim Harbaugh, his brother, came to coaching a very different way.  Jim was a player, a star QB who played for the Bears.  Jim has a twitter account, John doesn't.  Jim worked at Stanford and now at the Niners; John works in blue collar Baltimore, which is pretty much like lunch pail Philly.  Jim is used to being the star QB; John is the Xs and Os guy.  And John is your typical older brother: he is OCD to a fault, while Jim is your younger brother who has fun.  

Bears Coach Mike Ditka with a young QB Jim Harbaugh back in the day.  Mike Ditka once played tight end for the Eagles.  I'm not saying Ditka is tough, but he'd probably go 15 rounds with a drunk Cossack.


First, let's look at Jim's playing record.  Jim never was a great player, but he had some good years, particularly 1990 and 91 with the Bears, and 1995 with the Colts.  He was still playing as late as 2000.  Some of the QBs who are comparable to Harbaugh career are guys like Jeff Hostetler, Craig Morton, Joe Ferguson and Norm Snead--guys who played a long time, won some of the time, but don't stand out as first rank guys.  But Jim was definitely an NFL QB and knew a lot from playing.

Now let's look at Jim's coaching record.  First of all, somehow from 1994-2001, while being an NFL QB, he's also an ass't coach at Western Kentucky.  Not sure how he did this, but there it is.  In 2002 and 2003 he was the QB coach for the Oakland Raiders.   He coached U Delaware's Rich Gannon both years, the first year to a 12-4 mark, the second year to a brutal 4-12 mark, though to be fair, by 2003 Gannon was 38 years old and had reached the end of the line.  

Jim Harbaugh then went to UCSD for three years to coach football.  Some people say that's a surfing school, but I happen to know they have a decent Bio department.  I'm not sure about their football program but hey, it's sunny most of the time.   And hey, it's in La Jolla.  

The Symbol of Stanford University, the "Harvard of the West"



After this, Harbaugh got to the big time and became the coach of the Stanford Cardinal for four years, where he didn't have a winning season for two years (though he did manage to beat USC) but went 8-4 and got a bowl bid in 2009, and then went 11-1 in 2010, losing only to Oregon and new Eagles' coach Chip Kelly.  It is of interest that Harbaugh used to outcoach Pete Carroll in college, when Carroll was at USC, and has continued to coach well against him in the NFC West now that Carroll is at Seattle.  

Jim Harbaugh as coach of the Stanford Cardinal.  Stanford is a lot like Harvard except they only have had one President, Herbert Hoover, and he kind of  was Jimmy Carter before Jimmy Carter.   Except we like Hoover's great-granddaughter on Fox, who's kind of hot, in a married, fair and balanced, sort of safe and conservative, way.   Smoking hot.  Actually, every girl at Stanford looks like Margaret Hoover.  Who went to Bryn Mawr, by the way, not Stanford.  That's in Philly.


Jim Harbaugh's two years as Niner's Head Coach have been unqualified successes.  He has gone 13-3 last year and 11-4-1 this year, and was 1-1 in the playoffs last year, losing the NFC title game, while this year he went 2-0 in the playoffs and won the NFC title game.  Another interesting point is that he was unafraid to bench his starting QB from a year ago, Alex Smith, in favor of Colin Kaepernick, an untested QB, this year, which was unconventional, but worked well.  

The Hoover Instituion - Named for Herbert Hoover, the only Stanford Grad to become United States President (1929-1933).  Widely considered to be the worst President in US History by most historians.  This is a landmark on Stanford's campus, along with their football stadium, at which the Grateful Dead used to play regularly.

However, on balance, the edge here has to go to the Ravens on coaching.  John Harbaugh has more years and more experience, and has gotten it done for a longer time than his very gifted and able brother.  Moreover, John has been coaching his team, the Ravens, for a long time, and the Ravens have veteran leaders who have played in big games, including Ray Lewis, who played in and won the Super Bowl at the beginning of the 2000 decade.  

Herbert Hoover's Great-Granddaughter Margaret Hoover, who is typical of the look of most Stanford coeds--blonde and intelligent--except she is a graduate of Bryn Mawr College outside Philadelphia.  


This brings us to the second reason for favoring the Ravens--QB and leadership.  Colin Kaepernick when he starts at QB in the Super Bowl will be starting with fewer games under his belt than all but two QBs in NFL history--only Jeff Hostetler for the Giants in 1990 and Vince Ferragamo for the Rams in 1979 had fewer games started than Kaepernick does at present, and Hostetler only won the game against the Bills due to a shanked FG at the end, as all loyal Bills fans know.  Ferragamo was not particularly effective.  Joe Flacco on the other hand, has been devastating in the post season, and is an experienced passer who specializes in delivering the downfield pass to experienced receivers.  

On leadership, the Ravens have Ray Lewis and many other defensive leaders who are experienced and battle tested from many playoff games--and while the Niners are a good team, they do not have the experience and the leadership of the Ravens.  

Finally, and this comes down to coaching philosophy and style of team.  Both teams are defensive, both teams have excellent running attacks, and both teams can pass the ball.  However, Baltimore has a classic drop back QB who specializes in delivering the ball downfield for maximum gain, while the SF QB is still in some sort of option/West Coast offense where he can choose to run, pass or pass it for medium to long yardage.  

Everything we know about offense in the NFL, and particularly about playoff games, tells us that the most effective offense is the one that maximizes one key stat, which is passing yards gained per completed pass.  Here, the two QBs are very close--Flacco averaged 12 yards per completion during the regular season, while Kaepernick averaged 13 ypc during the regular season.  Flacco did about this well against NE in the title game, while Kaepernick did around 15 ypc against the Falcons.  

However, Kaepernick will be throwing against Baltimore's defense, while Flacco will be throwing against the Niner's defense.  The Niner's defense was vulnerable to Matt Ryan while the Ravens' defense has excellent pass rushing and pass coverage.  Here the balance will tilt to the advantage of Flacco, who will throw downfield a few times rather than throwing many times and risking turnovers.  

Consequently, on balance, we have to favor the Ravens.

The MVP of Super Bowl 35 in 2000:  Ray Lewis.  The three time winner is Joe Montana;  the two time winners are Bart Starr, Terry Bradshaw, Tom Brady & Eli Manning.  

Ray Lewis will retire a champion, and we think he will join the all-time list above of two time Super Bowl MVPs.  

Art Kyriazis, Philly.

Edgar Allan Poe

The Raven

[First published in 1845]


Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered weak and weary,
Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore,
While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping,
As of some one gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door.
`'Tis some visitor,' I muttered, `tapping at my chamber door -
Only this, and nothing more.'

Ah, distinctly I remember it was in the bleak December,
And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor.
Eagerly I wished the morrow; - vainly I had sought to borrow
From my books surcease of sorrow - sorrow for the lost Lenore -
For the rare and radiant maiden whom the angels named Lenore -
Nameless here for evermore.

And the silken sad uncertain rustling of each purple curtain
Thrilled me - filled me with fantastic terrors never felt before;
So that now, to still the beating of my heart, I stood repeating
`'Tis some visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door -
Some late visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door; -
This it is, and nothing more,'

Presently my soul grew stronger; hesitating then no longer,
`Sir,' said I, `or Madam, truly your forgiveness I implore;
But the fact is I was napping, and so gently you came rapping,
And so faintly you came tapping, tapping at my chamber door,
That I scarce was sure I heard you' - here I opened wide the door; -
Darkness there, and nothing more.

Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing,
Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
But the silence was unbroken, and the darkness gave no token,
And the only word there spoken was the whispered word, `Lenore!'
This I whispered, and an echo murmured back the word, `Lenore!'
Merely this and nothing more.

Back into the chamber turning, all my soul within me burning,
Soon again I heard a tapping somewhat louder than before.
`Surely,' said I, `surely that is something at my window lattice;
Let me see then, what thereat is, and this mystery explore -
Let my heart be still a moment and this mystery explore; -
'Tis the wind and nothing more!'

Open here I flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,
In there stepped a stately raven of the saintly days of yore.
Not the least obeisance made he; not a minute stopped or stayed he;
But, with mien of lord or lady, perched above my chamber door -
Perched upon a bust of Pallas just above my chamber door -
Perched, and sat, and nothing more.

Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,
`Though thy crest be shorn and shaven, thou,' I said, `art sure no craven.
Ghastly grim and ancient raven wandering from the nightly shore -
Tell me what thy lordly name is on the Night's Plutonian shore!'
Quoth the raven, `Nevermore.'

Much I marvelled this ungainly fowl to hear discourse so plainly,
Though its answer little meaning - little relevancy bore;
For we cannot help agreeing that no living human being
Ever yet was blessed with seeing bird above his chamber door -
Bird or beast above the sculptured bust above his chamber door,
With such name as `Nevermore.'

But the raven, sitting lonely on the placid bust, spoke only,
That one word, as if his soul in that one word he did outpour.
Nothing further then he uttered - not a feather then he fluttered -
Till I scarcely more than muttered `Other friends have flown before -
On the morrow he will leave me, as my hopes have flown before.'
Then the bird said, `Nevermore.'

Startled at the stillness broken by reply so aptly spoken,
`Doubtless,' said I, `what it utters is its only stock and store,
Caught from some unhappy master whom unmerciful disaster
Followed fast and followed faster till his songs one burden bore -
Till the dirges of his hope that melancholy burden bore
Of "Never-nevermore."'

But the raven still beguiling all my sad soul into smiling,
Straight I wheeled a cushioned seat in front of bird and bust and door;
Then, upon the velvet sinking, I betook myself to linking
Fancy unto fancy, thinking what this ominous bird of yore -
What this grim, ungainly, ghastly, gaunt, and ominous bird of yore
Meant in croaking `Nevermore.'

This I sat engaged in guessing, but no syllable expressing
To the fowl whose fiery eyes now burned into my bosom's core;
This and more I sat divining, with my head at ease reclining
On the cushion's velvet lining that the lamp-light gloated o'er,
But whose velvet violet lining with the lamp-light gloating o'er,
She shall press, ah, nevermore!

Then, methought, the air grew denser, perfumed from an unseen censer
Swung by Seraphim whose foot-falls tinkled on the tufted floor.
`Wretch,' I cried, `thy God hath lent thee - by these angels he has sent thee
Respite - respite and nepenthe from thy memories of Lenore!
Quaff, oh quaff this kind nepenthe, and forget this lost Lenore!'
Quoth the raven, `Nevermore.'

`Prophet!' said I, `thing of evil! - prophet still, if bird or devil! -
Whether tempter sent, or whether tempest tossed thee here ashore,
Desolate yet all undaunted, on this desert land enchanted -
On this home by horror haunted - tell me truly, I implore -
Is there - is there balm in Gilead? - tell me - tell me, I implore!'
Quoth the raven, `Nevermore.'

`Prophet!' said I, `thing of evil! - prophet still, if bird or devil!
By that Heaven that bends above us - by that God we both adore -
Tell this soul with sorrow laden if, within the distant Aidenn,
It shall clasp a sainted maiden whom the angels named Lenore -
Clasp a rare and radiant maiden, whom the angels named Lenore?'
Quoth the raven, `Nevermore.'

`Be that word our sign of parting, bird or fiend!' I shrieked upstarting -
`Get thee back into the tempest and the Night's Plutonian shore!
Leave no black plume as a token of that lie thy soul hath spoken!
Leave my loneliness unbroken! - quit the bust above my door!
Take thy beak from out my heart, and take thy form from off my door!'
Quoth the raven, `Nevermore.'

And the raven, never flitting, still is sitting, still is sitting
On the pallid bust of Pallas just above my chamber door;
And his eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming,
And the lamp-light o'er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor;
And my soul from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor
Shall be lifted - nevermore!
horizontal space
vertical spacehttp://www.heise.de/ix/raven/Literature/Lore/TheRaven.html

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

NFC & AFC Title Game Predictions for Sunday January 20, 2013

NFC & AFC Title Game Predictions for Sunday January 20, 2013

Well, we're down to the "final four" of our annual NFL Super Bowl tournament.  

Last Week's Picks

We did very, very well again with last week's picks--we picked every game correctly, and only missed the Denver-Baltimore game, which was decided by a FG in a second overtime, 38-35.  But for the Baltimore upset, we would have been 4 for 4.

Taking the prior weekend's picks into account, we are 6 for 8 or batting .750.  Not too shabby.  

The Super Bowl was Named for the Wham-O "Super Ball".  See Discussion, Below.  I had one of these when I was a kid. As you can plainly see, SuperBalls were made of "amazing Zectron".  


Before we get to Denver-Baltimore, let's go over the other games.  SF-Green Bay played out like we saw it in the first half, a very close game.  In the second half, Green Bay seemed to play tired, like a team coming off a wild card round, while SF seemed like the rested team they were, and SF steadily pulled away in the second half.  While it was surprising that QB Aaron Rodgers did not provide more offense in the 2d half, it's also true that he was slightly missing on some throws while SF seemed to make all the big plays.  Again, fatigue has to play a role in things like that, and Rodgers, for Green Bay to win, has to toss it up there @50 times a game.    

The Seahawks-Falcons game also played out like we thought through @ 2 1/2 quarters, with the Falcons in firm control and up twenty points.  Then, the Seahawks, as with last week, mounted a furious comeback, eventually taking the lead 28-27 with less than a minute to go.  This again shows how evenly matched those teams were,and how very good a coach Pete Carroll is--his team never quit, even though they were on the road and they were tired.  You had to love the way Seattle played.  But even better was the way Atlanta responded--by going fifty yards in less than 20 seconds and then kicking the GW FG--showing that Matt Ryan's experience--something we touted last week--together with the home field advantage--kicking in a dome is FG friendly--would prove very helpful to the Falcons when it came down to it.  So we got that one right.  Barely, but right.

Finally, we got the Pats-Texans game exactly right.  The Texans are a fine team, but they can't keep up with the Pats' offense, and they can't hold them defensively.  That was not even a close game, and we didn't think it would be, so we picked that one correctly and for the right reasons.  

So where did we go wrong with Denver?  What is the lesson?  Never pick Peyton Manning against Ray Lewis in a playoff game?  Well actually Peyton Manning was 2-0 vs Baltimore in prior playoff games.   

Here's a stat worth considering:  Jake the Snake Plummer and Tim Tebow each have more playoff wins in a Denver Broncos jersey as starting QBs, than Peyton Manning.  This has to be embarassing to Peyton Manning, whose little brother Eli Manning of the NY Giants has two Super Bowl wins against the NE Pats on his resume to Peyton's one win in the Super Bowl.

Well, we said Ray Lewis was a warrior, and in the end, the Baltimore Defense made Peyton Manning look awful.  They won the game by forcing him to roll right in OT, and make a terrible off balance throw that resulted in an interception, a throw that Peyton Manning never makes, normally speaking.  This results in an INT, Baltimore gets the ball, goes down and kicks the GW FG, game over.  

This is really the story.  

PREDICTIONS FOR AFC CHAMPIONSHIP AND NFC CHAMPIONSHIP THIS WEEKEND


Ravens at Pats 3 PM Sunday AFC Championship

First, we have the Baltimore Ravens at the New England Patriots in the early game, scheduled for 3 pm in New England, in a rematch of last years AFC title game.  There are three games we can look at here.

Initially, we have this years game between the two teams, which the Ravens won 31-30 on a GW FG as time expired, in week 3 of the season, back in September, in Baltimore.  The Baltimore defense essentially held Brady in check while Flacco & the Baltimore offense scored 10 unanswered points in the last five minutes of the game to beat the Pats.  Strong stuff.  

Second, you have last years AFC championship game, which the Pats won 23-20.   However, as everyone knows, Baltimore had a chip shot FG to tie, which Billy Cundiff missed with barely any time left on the clock, and Baltimore had numerous other opportunities in the 4th Quarter to come back from a 23-20 deficit.  The Pats were very lucky to escape out of that game as victors.  

Third, you have the 2009 wild card round game, wherein Baltimore came into New England and soundly whipped them, 33-14.  

Baltimore is the one team in the AFC that really gives Tom Brady trouble.  

Baltimore will be motivated to win because they lost last year, because Ray Lewis is looking at his last year, and because they know they can beat this New England team.  

On paper, this matchup strongly favors the Patriots, and they are at home, but the pick here is the Ravens in an upset.  

Ray Lewis is going to the Super Bowl.  

49ers at Falcons - NFC Championship

This is a very closely matched game on the stats.  Common opponents don't really say much--the 49ers beat the Saints, while the Falcons split with the Saints, winning one and losing one.  The 49ers split with the Seahawks, winning one and losing one, while the Falcons hung on to beat the Seahawks in the playoff game this past weekend.  All this tells us is that both teams can play against very good opponents like the Seahawks and Saints and beat them on a given day.  It also tells us on any given Sunday either of them might lose to the Saints or the Seahawks, which we probably already knew, and therefore, there's no 100% probability that if these guys played three games, one team would sweep all three--much more likely that there would be a split and then a deciding game.  

However, they only play one, and in this one, we pick the 49ers. The Falcons have much going for them--the home field, Matt Ryan being due, and Atlanta being ripe for a trip to the Super Bowl.  But on the other side you have a very tough SF 49er team, which features the rushing attack of one day HOFer Frank Gore (U. Miami Hurricane), who is 3d among career RBs in career rushing, just behind Adrian Peterson and both trailing Steven Jackson.  Gore is supplemented by a running QB in Colin Kaepernick, and a fervent defense.  

David Akers, who is a veteran kicker, should be an advantage, but he presents some weakness from beyond 40 yards, especially compared to Atlanta's kicker Bryant.  If it comes down to FGs, there is an edge somewhat to Atlanta, though the dome will help both kickers.    The pick is still the 49ers.  

Postscript

We mentioned great RBs last week--but we forget to mention Emmitt Smith and Tony Dorsett among the greatest ever.  Smith is obviously among the greatest RBs ever to play the game, and a true champion, while Tony Dorsett, also a Dallas Cowboy great, could also do it all.  Both were great rushing as well as receiving, and both were durable and versatible backs who were at their best in the playoffs and in the biggest games.  No one could possible leave them off their teams.  Another mention has to be made of Franco Harris, the powerful and durable back of the Steelers dynasty of the 1970s.  

We were once (several of us) at a Penn-Princeton football game  many years back and sitting right in front of us, was Franco Harris, who was watching his son with the Princetonians.  He looked pretty much as he did during his playing days, and on his fingers were the four Super Bowl rings--quite a sight, mind you.  

We were not worthy.  

In fairness, you'd want a Franco Harris or an Emmitt Smith or a Tony Dorsett on your team any day of the week.  They were winners, and I can't count how many Super Bowls, Conference Championships, playoff games, they all won  collectively, but it has to be a ton.  

The Name of the Super Bowl Derived from the Wham-O Super Ball, as Shown by This Exhibit in the Pro Football HOF in Canton, OH.  The fact that Lamar Hunt coined the name is recited therein.  The owners had decided to call it the "AFL-NFL Championship Game".  Well, you see how well that worked.  No .92 resiliency coefficient.  "After watching his children play with a Super Ball, Lamar Hunt, founder of the American Football League, coined the term Super Bowl. In a July 25, 1966, letter to NFL commissioner Pete Rozelle, Hunt wrote, "I have kiddingly called it the 'Super Bowl,' which obviously can be improved upon." Although the leagues' owners decided on the name "AFL-NFL Championship Game," the media immediately picked up on Hunt's "Super Bowl" name, which would become official beginning with the third annual game.[8][17][18]"  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Ball


Final PS point:  

The Super Bowl was named after the Wham-O toy, the "Super Ball"

It's true.  Lamar Hunt and his fellow owners were sitting around one day figuring out what to call the new championship game back in the mid-60s and they got the name from the "Super" of "Super Ball".  It's told right here at: http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Is-the-Super-Bowl-really-named-after-a-1960s-chi?urn=nfl-317028.

The key source for this story on the website is Michael MacCambridge's "America's Game: The Epic Story of How Pro Football Captured a Nation."  (Random House, NY, NY 2004).  It can be located at Amazon.com at:

http://www.amazon.com/Americas-Game-Football-Captured-Nation/dp/B001PIHVHG/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&qid=1296844692&sr=8-15

Here's the Yahoo article: 

"Is the Super Bowl Really Named After a Children's Toy?"
It seems too much like an urban legend to be true that the Super Bowl was named after a children's novelty toy that was popular in the mid-1960s.
But strange as it sounds, it is. The name of America's biggest sport event got its name from a Wham-O toy called "Super Ball." The story was recounted in Michael MacCambridge's book, "America's Game."
Once the NFL-AFL merger was announced, discussions began about the inaugural championship game between the winners of the two leagues. A group of seven men were tasked with the specifics. During the course of the meetings, it became confusing when the men referred to "the championship game" because the others didn't know whether he was referring to the league championship games or the finale, which still didn't have a name. To end the mix-ups, Kansas City Chiefs founder Lamar Hunt jokingly referred to the final championship game as the "Super Bowl." He had come up with the name while watching his children play with the toy pictured above.
"Super Bowl" is how the game was referred to for months, even though Hunt himself said it was "far too corny" to ever be used on the big stage. In the middle of 1966, he wrote commissioner Pete Rozelle and said the group needed to come up with an official name for the game. "If possible," he wrote, "I believe we should 'coin a phrase' for the Championship Game. [...] I have kiddingly called it the 'Super Bowl,' which obviously can be improved upon."
Rozelle agreed. The league's publicity director recalled that the commissioner despised the word "super," because it didn't have any sophistication. Rozelle was evidently a "stickler on words and grammar." The game would be known as the "AFL-NFL World Championship Game."
That bulky title didn't last. People caught wind of Hunt's name and soon everyone, from media members to players, were calling the title game "the Super Bowl." The NFL was slow to adapt, though. It wasn't until the third game that the words "Super Bowl" appeared on the official game program and the fourth game when the phrase appeared on tickets.
As mentioned above, Michael MacCambridge's excellent "America's Game: The Epic Story of How Pro Football Captured a Nation" was the main reference for this blog post.
citation supra.  

The Original Patent for the SuperBall aka "Highly Resilient Polybutadiene Ball" Patented by Wham-O Corp 1965.

http://www.google.com/patents/US3241834?printsec=abstract&dq=3,241,834&ei=0O31UMbaGOjw0QHFoIGIDQ#v=onepage&q=3%2C241%2C834&f=false

March 22, 1966 N. H. STINGLEY 3,241,834
HIGHLY RESILIENT POLYBUTADIENE BALL
Filed Aug. 25, 1965
[blocks in formation]

United States Patent O
.1
3,241,834
HIGHLY RESELIENT POLYBUTADIENE BALL 
Norman H. Stingley, Garden Grove, Calif., assignor to
Wham-0 Manufacturing Company, San Gabriel, Calif.,
at corporation of California
Filed Aug. 25, 1965, Ser. No. 432,584
3 Claims. (Cl. 273--58)
This is a continuation-in-part of application Serial No. 462,081 filed June 7, 1965, and now abandoned.
This invention relates to a toy and more particularly to a ball or sphere having extremely high resilience and a high coeflicient of friction.
The resiliency of rubber balls is one of their most important characteristics. This is because the resiliency of the ball material determines the “liveliness” and “bounce” of the ball and hence its utility in various sporting games and attractiveness as a toy for children. The resilient material normally used for making rubber balls is a polymer such as natural rubber or some synthetic analog of natural rubber such as polyisoprene.
The present invention is concerned with a material other than rubber and -polyisoprene as the base polymer in rubber toys and sporting articles. It has been found that this new material imparts some highly unusual qualities to articles fabricated with it. Such articles have been found to have a substantially greater resiliency than those manufactured from more conventional materials. This greater resiliency is thought to be due to the nature of the base polymer used in the mixture and the unique quality -of the mixture which comprises the article of being able to conserve the energy which is imparted to it rather than dissipating a substantial portion of it in the form of heat. The higher resilience means that balls made from the material of this invention have a resilience factor in excess of 90%. This resilience factor is the resilience of the material as measured by the Yerzley method, ASTM D945-59.
Another unusual quality of balls and toys of this invention is their coeflicient of friction. In this instance the coefficient friction is substantially higher than in other
similar items. This quality combined with the significant
ly higher resilience causes a ball to react in an extraordinary and unpredictable manner when bounced or struck. This higher coeflicient of friction also provides a means whereby the spin or “English” on a thrown, struck or dropped ball can be accentuated resulting in unusual reactions by -theball whenever it rebounds from a hard surface. This novel combination of qualities means that one natural application for ‘balls manufactured with the base polymer with which this invention is concerned is in trick ball uses. In addition, as a sports implement a ball of this invention presents -a greater challenge -to the user. As an article of play, the eccentricity of reaction makes the ball highly entertaining and amusing toy.
The invention in the present case contemplates a molded, vulcanized, highly resilient ball comprising a mixture of polybutadiene, a sulfurous vulcanizing agent and a polybutadiene reinforcing agent.
In addition to the inherent resilience of the base polymer, the degree of cross linkage between -polymer chains is important in optimizing the bounce or liveliness of balls fabricated with it. The -degree of cross linkage is primarily determined by the amount of vulcanizing agent used. By limiting the amount of vulcanizing agent introduced into the mixture to the quantities specified below, a ball having a Yerzley resilience in excess of 90% is obtained. Such a resilience factor is substantially higher than that found in balls manufactured from natural rubber or polyisoprene.
In addition to resilience and cross linkage, the ability
10
15
20
25
30
35
45
50
55
60
65
70
[merged small][merged small][graphic][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][graphic][graphic][graphic][graphic][merged small][graphic][graphic]
In the formulation above polybutadiene is the base polymer of the mixture. To produce cross linkage between polybutadiene chains, that is, to vulcanize or cure the polymer, sulfur is added to the mixture. A greater amount of vulcanizing agent is used in this mixture than in such products as tires thereby producing a greater degree of vulcanization. Put another way, the degree of cross linkage relative -to saturation (hard rubber) is increased over tires and the like. The more complete vulcanization is believed to result in the improved resilience of the finished product. The addition of sulfur in the range indicated will result in balls having a Yerzley Resilience in excess of 90%. Oil extended polybutadiene having as much as 50 parts by weight of oil per hundred parts by weight of polybutadiene can also be used as the base polymer.
Because the natural curing rate of a mixture of polybutadiene and sulfur is quite slow, certain other additives are combined with this basic mixture to initiate the curing cycle and accelerate the rate of vulcanization. The zinc oxide and stearic acid are added to the basic mixture to provide this activation function. Acceleration accomplishes two purposes, one, it shortens the length of the molding cycle, and two, it equalizes heat throughout the mixture during the curing cycle. In the preceding formulation, the accelerators are N-oxydiethylene benzothiazole 2 sulfenamide, di-orthotolylguanidine and bismuth dimethyldithiocarbonate. For ease of reference, the trade names AMAX, DOTG and Bismate respectively will be used to designate the accelerators.
The activation of these accelerators occurs as the mixture reaches a specific temperature. For Bismate and DOTG the activation temperature is approximately 230° F. while that of AMAX is -approximately 260° F. By insuring that t-he heat of reaction is equalized throughout the mixture a more uniform rate of vulcanization and improved consistency in the end product is obtained.
Hydrated silica is added to the mixture as a filler. A specific hydrated silica suitable for use in this mixture is marketed under the trademark Hi-Sil 233. This material and certain other materials perform the function of providing tear and abrasion resistance. The basic criteria for selection of the filler material is its ability to improve the durability of polybutadiene without unduly increasing the specific gravity. Carbon black and lithium oxide have also been found to fill these requirements and are satisfactory substitutes for the hydrated silica.

3,241,834
3
In addition to the ingredients just previously discussed, 4 methyl-6 tertiary-butyl phenol is also added to the mixture. This substance has been given the trade name of Antioxidant 2246 and prevents discoloration and staining and inhibits aging of the finished product. Examples of substitutes for Antioxidant 2246 are phenyl B naphthylamine, alkyl diphenylamine, and hindered alkyl phenols. Pigmenting agents for obtaining the desired color of the end product are optional additives.
The mixture and molding of the constituents of this formulation proceeds according to the following steps. The various elements of the formulation are brought together in a mixing machine and agitated thoroughly to insare uniform mixing and distribution of the elements throughout the mixture. The result is a plastic mass ready for insertion in a mold.
To complete the process, the mixture is placed in a nold and subjected to a pressure of between 500 and 3,000 p.s.i. for a period of approximately 10 to 30 minutes. Simultaneously, the temperature of the mixture is raised to approximately 285-340° F. To a certain extent the length of the molding operation, the pressure, and the temperature to which the formulation is subjected are co-variant and one may be adjusted to compensate for a variation in the other. Preferably the time and temperature for the molding operation is 15 to 20 minutes at approximately 320° F. and 1,000 p.s.i.
An alternate formulation to the one outlined above is as follows:
[graphic][graphic][merged small][graphic][graphic]
The above formulation is mixed in the same manner as the preceding formulation. To insure a good dispersion of all ingredients in the mixture, the batch is normally given a two-pass mix. In the above formulation, the zinc oxide and the stearic acid perform the same functions, viz., activation of polymer curing, as they did in the first formulation. Akron 544 Red and Akron 626 Blue are trade designations for organic coloring agents manufactured by Akron Chemical Co. Titanium dioxide is also a coloring agent. These three constituents in combination are the pigmenting agent for the mixture.
Zeolex is a proprietary brand name for a series of precipitated, highly hydrated sodium silico-aluminates and sodium calcium silico-aluminates. Its function is to strengthen the finished product and to act as a filler in the same manner as the Hi-Sil 233 does in the preceding formulation.
Sulfur is the vulcanizing agent. Vandex is a proprietary name for finely ground selenium. Its function is to supplement sulfur as a vulcanizing agent.
As in the first formulation, several constituents of the mixture (AMAX and M. Tuads) are added to serve as accelerators for the polymerization.
U1
15
20
25
30
40
|>l> U1
50
60
4
As is normal in molding tehniques, the curing temperature must be carefully selected in order to prevent imperfections in the finished product. Too high a molding temperature will contribute to a condition designated “backrind.” This condition is characterized by an indented fracture around the body of the molded product defining the point where the two halves of the mold are brought together and is due to thermal expansion in this area during and after the molding cycle.
Subject to the proper choice of injection pressure, injection time, and the combination of mixture constituents, preheat, and mold temperature, this mixture can also be molded by means of a conventional injection-molding technique.
Combinations of ingredients of which the two formulations listed above are representative have been found to result in a product with a specific gravity of approximately 1.0 to 1.3. For greatest resilience, it has been found that a sufficient amount of filler should be added to produce a product having a specific gravity of 1.02.
What is claimed is:
1. A highly resilient solid ball in the form of a sphere, the ball material having a specific gravity of from about 1 to about 1.3, and comprising in combination a vulcanized polymer characterized by the use of 100 parts by weight of polybutadiene and 0.5 to 15 parts by weight of a sulfur vulcanizing agent, and further comprising, in addition to any activators and accelerators used for vulcanization, 5 to 15 parts by weight of an inorganic reinforcing material.
2. A ball in accordance with claim 1 in which the reinforcing material is selected from the class consisting of hydrated silica, carbon black and lithium oxide.
3. A ball in accordance with claim 2 in which the sul
' fur vulcanizing agent is approximately 5.25 parts by
weight and the reinforcing material is approximately 7.5 parts by weight.
References Cited by the Examiner
[blocks in formation]