Friday, June 7, 2013

Argonauts

Georgios Seferis 

Mythistorema

4

Argonauts

And a soul
if it is to know itself
must look
into its own soul:
the stranger and enemy, we've seen him in the mirror.

They were good, the companions, they didn't complain
about the work or the thirst or the frost,
they had the bearing of trees and waves
that accept the wind and the rain
accept the night and the sun
without changing in the midst of change.
They were fine, whole days
they sweated at the oars with lowered eyes
breathing in rhythm
and their blood reddened a submissive skin.
Sometimes they sang, with lowered eyes
as we were passing the deserted island with the Barbary figs
to the west, beyond the cape of the dogs
that bark.
If it is to know itself, they said
it must look into its own soul, they said
and the oar's struck the sea's gold
in the sunset.
We went past many capes many islands the sea
leading to another sea, gulls and seals.
Sometimes disconsolate women wept
lamenting their lost children
and others frantic sought Alexander the Great
and glories buried in the depths of Asia.

We moored on shores full of night-scenes,
the birds singing, with waters that left on the hands
the memory of a great happiness.
But the voyages did not end.
Their souls became one with the oars and the oarlocks
with the solemn face of the prow
with the rudder's wake
with the water that shattered their image.
The companions died one by one,
with lowered eyes. Their oars
mark the place where they sleep on the shore.

No one remembers them. Justice

[NOTE:  THIS IS PART OF A LARGER POEM, AND IT IS MUCH FINER IN THE ORIGINAL GREEK.]


Placque devoted to G. Seferis Nobel Prize Winning Greek Poet



The Nobel Prize in Literature 1963 Awarded to Giorgios Seferis of Greece

Award Ceremony Speech

Presentation Speech by Anders Österling, Permanent Secretary of the Swedish Academy
This year's Nobel Prize in Literature has been awarded to the Greek poet Giorgos Seferis, who was born in 1900 at Smyrna, which he left at an early age to accompany his family to Athens. After the Greeks were driven out of Asia Minor, and Seferis's home town had gone up in flames, homelessness - ever the fate of an oppressed and scattered people - was to play a decisive role during his adult years in more ways than one. Seferis studied in Paris, then entered the diplomatic service, went into exile with the Free Greek Government when Greece was occupied in 1941, and was moved about from country to country during the Second World War, when he served his country in Crete, in Cairo, in South Africa, in Turkey, and in the Middle East. After six years as ambassador in London, he retired last year and returned to Athens to devote himself entirely to his literary work.

Seferis's poetic production is not large, but because of the uniqueness of its thought and style and the beauty of its language, it has become a lasting symbol of all that is indestructible in the Hellenic affirmation of life. Now that Palamas and Sikelianos are dead, Seferis is today the representative Hellenic poet, carrying on the classical heritage; a leading national figure, he is also acclaimed abroad in so far as his poetry has been made available in translation. Here in Sweden his work was presented thirteen years ago by Hjalmar Gullberg, whose translations included the famous The King of Asine, the theme of which has a connection with Sweden because of our archaeologists' successful excavations on this site. Using imagination as a tool, Seferis tries in this poem to penetrate the secret behind a name that is merely mentioned in a verse of the Iliad.

When reading Seferis we are forcibly reminded of a fact that is sometimes forgotten: geographically, Greece is not only a peninsula but also a world of water and foam, strewn with myriad islands, an ancient sea kingdom, the perilous and stormy home of the mariner. This Greece is the constant background of his poetry, in which it is conjured up as the vision of a grandeur both harsh and tender. Seferis does this with a language of rare subtlety, both rhythmical and metaphorical. It has rightly been said that he, better than anyone else, has interpreted the mystery of the stones, of the dead fragments of marble, and of the silent, smiling statues. In his evocative poems, figures from ancient Greek mythology appear together with recent events in the Mediterranean's bloody theatre of war. His poetry sometimes seems difficult to interpret, particularly because Seferis is reluctant to expose his inner self, preferring to hide behind a mask of anonymity. He often expresses his grief and bitterness through the medium of a central narrative figure, a kind of Odysseus with features borrowed from the old seamen in the lost Smyrna of the poet's youth. But in his hollow voice is dramatized much of Greece's historical fatality, its shipwrecks and its rescues, its disasters and its valour. Technically, Seferis has received vital impulses from T. S. Eliot, but underneath the tone is unmistakably his own, often carrying a broken echo of the music from an ancient Greek chorus.

Seferis once described himself, "I am a monotonous and obstinate man who, for twenty years, has not ceased to say the same things over and over again." There is perhaps some truth in this description, but one must remember that the message he feels bound to convey is inseparable from the intellectual life of his generation as it finds itself confronted with ancient Greek civilization, a heritage that presents a formidable challenge to the impoverished heir. In one of his most significant poems Seferis describes a dream in which a marble head - too heavy for his arms, yet impossible to push aside - fell upon him at the moment of awakening. It is in this state of mind that he sings the praise of the dead, for only communication with the dead conversing on their asphodel meadows can bring to the living a hope of peace, confidence, and justice. In Seferis's interpretation the story of the Argonauts becomes a parable halfway between myth and history, a parable of oarsmen who must fail before they reach their goal.

But Seferis animates this background of melancholy resignation with the eloquent joy inspired in him by his country's mountainous islands with their whitewashed houses rising in terraces above an azure sea, a harmony of colours that we find again in the Greek flag. In concluding this brief presentation, I should like to add that the prize has been awarded to Seferis "for his eminent lyrical writing, inspired by a deep feeling for the Hellenic world of culture."

Dear Sir - In honouring you, it has been a great privilege for the Swedish Academy to pay its tribute to the Greece of today, whose rich literature has had to wait, perhaps too long, for the Nobel laurels. Extending to you the congratulations of the Swedish Academy, I ask you to receive from the hands of His Majesty, the King, this year's Prize in Literature.
From Nobel Lectures, Literature 1901-1967, Editor Horst Frenz, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1969

Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 1963

[NOTE:  GREECE, IN THE 20TH CENTURY, HAD TWO NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS IN LITERATURE, AND MANY ARGUE THAT CAVAFY SHOULD HAVE WON ALSO.]

President Obama's Proposed Changes to the Patent System by Executive Order and by Legislative Change - Repost of Prof. Crouch's comments

Some additional notes upon further reflection on the Obama Patent Reform Announcements - Are they Just Selective Tort Reform?


By Arthur J. Kyriazis, Biotechnology Consultant, Molecular Biologist, M.Sc.E.

[some additional notes upon reflection:  After reflecting on this, it comes to mind that this series of proposals and changes by President Obama amounts to a proposal of TORT REFORM for industries and companies which are heavily depending on patent portfolios.  Essentially, the proposals are to 1) limit the scope of patent claims, which would more closely approximate the Japanese system, wherein patent claims are narrow, and patent litigation is therefore discouraged in favor of the trading of patent rights 2) make plaintiffs pay litigation costs if they lose, which is the British loser pays rule, a keystone of Tort Reform (although the jurisprudence of loser pays in the British Courts is complex and tedious, since there is complex litigation after the trial over who "won" and who "lost" each and every point, and who who therefore should bear the cost on each and every point.] 


[The Basic point being, if the President really wants to unshackle US Industry and make it competitive, he should come across with a comprehensive Tort Reform package, and focus on unshackling physicians, attorneys, businessmen in general, from lawsuits, and apply these principles across the board, instead of proposing a "GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD" to his friends at Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, etc. who happen to have large patent portfolios, and have suddenly discovered that the plaintiffs' bar has targeted them for litigation.  To paraphrase Willie Sutton, the reason the Plaintiff's Bar has targeted companies with large patent portfolios, is because this is where the money is.  But when it came to Tort Reform as part of Obama Care, the President and the Democrats said NO even though malpractice, and the cost of defending frivolous malpractice, is probably 50-90% of the reason health care costs are so high in the US compared with civil law countries like Europe, where it is impossible to sue a doctor for medical malpractice.  And the President and the Democratic Party stand and stood opposed to President Bush's sensible proposals for tort reform across the board, but here the President wants Tort Reform for the Patent Holders only--carving out a special exception of Tort Reform for Businessmen who are Democrats?  None of this makes any sense.]  

If the President wants Tort Reform, he should simply propose it across the board.  This might gain bipartisan support for his other proposals by gaining support from the business, medical and opposition communities.  

Patent Reform 2013: Adding Clarity and Transparency to the System

By Dennis Crouch
The Google-Oracle-Samsung-Microsoft-Apple et al Patent Litigations - Why I-Phone 4 is illegal Now
Prof. Crouch's comments are pro-Obama; we do not favor Pres. Obama's actions, and indeed, we are of the opinion that his proposed actions via executive order exceed his powers and will eventually be challenged in court and reversed or overturned.  Also, the experts who studied this problem for the White House, are, without exception, all anti-patent and favor a system whrere there is no patent protection at all, notwithstanding that we are international signatories to an international treaty known as the PCT, and international treaties covering trademark, copyright and other IP rights with all other countries.  If we relax IP protections, then all that will remain will be international piracy on a global scale.  
other pertinent links:  the official white house statement:
the official executive report, which surprisingly is only 14 pages long:
the Patent Troll

[For the record, the patent assertion entities holding the most patents, who do a great deal of litigation and asserting patent claims, are in fact universities.  Lemley, Mark A. "Are Universities Patent Trolls?" Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 63, no. 1 (2008): 611-631.  Prof. Mark Lemley was a major contributor to the report that underpinned the President's actions, and yet Lemley sees no distinction between PAEs and Universities, seeing both as Patent Trolls, which begs the semantic yet essential question, what on earth is a patent troll?] 
[according to an anonymous comment to this blog, the report was the work of  just a handful of professors:  anon said...
Prof. Mark A. Lemley's POV on Patents is pretty well-known.  He's Against Them.


"The bulk of the report that identifies the "problem" is based upon the work of professor Colleen Chien (Santa Clara); Jim Bessen & Mike Meurer (BU); Mark Lemley (Stanford) and Michele Boldrin (WUSTL) & David K. Levine (WUSTL)."
No kidding.
Prof. Colleen Chien UC Santa Clara.  Also anti-patent.

Never mind the fact that most of the predicate analysis has been debunked.]




President Obama today released information on planed executive orders and push for new legislation that will attempt to block companies from asserting their patents unless they are also manufacturing a product based upon the patented design. And at the same time, the President's National Economic Council and Council of Economic Advisers released a report a report titled "Patent Assertion and U.S. Innovation." The report generally takes the viewpoint that Patent Assertion Entities are bad for the US Economy and makes the bold claim that, in the past year PAE's have threatened "over 100,000 companies with patent infringement." The bulk of the report that identifies the "problem" is based upon the work of professor Colleen Chien (Santa Clara); Jim Bessen & Mike Meurer (BU); Mark Lemley (Stanford) and Michele Boldrin (WUSTL) & David K. Levine (WUSTL).
Despite the unknowing hyperbole of the report, the suggested actions are, for the most, welcome and will benefit the patent system as a whole. In fact, this move to finally address the problem of predictability of patent scope and patent validity hits the sweet spot of where problems emerge in the system. Of course, the devil will be in the details of these approaches.
Executive Actions:
1. Knowing Who Owns the Patents: Through the PTO a new rule will require patent applicants and owners to regularly update ownership information with the "real party of interest" so that the assignment records are accurate complete.
2. Tightening Functional Claiming. The PTO will provide new targeted training to its examiners on scrutiny of functional claims and will, over the next six months develop strategies to improve claim clarity, such as by use of glossaries in patent specifications to assist examiners in the software field.
In my view, these two elements are sorely needed and will generally improve the patent system without actually limiting the ability of patent assertion entities to derive value from their innovations through patent assertion. In addition, the PTO will begin a number of outreach mechanisms intended to provide assistance to non-patent-insiders who receive patent demand letter.
Legislative Actions:
1. Require patentees and applicants to disclose the "Real Party-in-Interest," by requiring that any party sending demand letters, filing an infringement suit or seeking PTO review of a patent to file updated ownership information, and enabling the PTO or district courts to impose sanctions for non-compliance. [DC: This would add statutory back-up for the PTO rulemaking]
2. Permit more discretion in awarding fees to prevailing parties in patent cases, providing district courts with more discretion to award attorney's fees under 35 USC 285 as a sanction for abusive court filings (similar to the legal standard that applies in copyright infringement cases). [DC: This can be helpful if allowed to go both-ways, although courts generally find that patent litigators are the most well-prepared and honorable of any that they see in court.]
3. Expand the PTO's transitional program for covered business method patents to include a broader category of computer-enabled patents and permit a wider range of challengers to petition for review of issued patents before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB). [DC: This has the potential of capturing a substantial percentage of issued patents, but that may be fine.]
4. Protect off-the-shelf use by consumers and businesses by providing them with better legal protection against liability for a product being used off-the-shelf and solely for its intended use. Also, stay judicial proceedings against such consumers when an infringement suit has also been brought against a vendor, retailer, or manufacturer. [DC: We are on our way here toward a fair use of patents.]
5. Change the ITC standard for obtaining an injunction to better align it with the traditional four-factor test in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, to enhance consistency in the standards applied at the ITC and district courts. [DC: The focus here is to get patent assertion entities out of the ITC]
6. Use demand letter transparency to help curb abusive suits, incentivizing public filing of demand letters in a way that makes them accessible and searchable to the public. [DC: This sounds good, I wonder how those writing demand letters would respond.]
7. Ensure the ITC has adequate flexibility in hiring qualified Administrative Law Judges. [DC: However, must ensure that the flexibility is not used to hire because of particular political bent.]

The European Unitary Patent System – 5 things Patent Attorneys need to know now - Reblog from Patently-O by Dennis Crouch

Jun 04, 2013

some random notes on the phillies

Delmon Young was an MVP for the Detroit Tigers in the 2012 Playoffs, but they used him as a DH.  He cannot play everyday in the National League, where every player has to field a position.


Adding some random notes on the abysmal, awful Delmon Young:

1)  my son and I went to the ballgame recently, and as great as Dominic Brown was, that was how comically awful Delmon Young was, attempting to field balls in RF.  He misjudged routine flyballs that went over his head and clanked off the base of the fence which beerleague softball players could have caught, he ran bad routes to routine fly balls, balls clanked off his glove, he has the fielding range of a musk ox, and while he does have a cannon for an arm, he has no idea where the cutoff man is or what base to throw to on any given play.  He is the worst major league OF we have ever seen, and we include in that list Greg Luzinski and Pat Burrell, who were both pretty limited in their abilities to play the field.  Delmon Young is even worse than Lonnie "Skates" Smith.

2)  According to the Bill James Goldmine of 2010, Delmon Young has the highest percentage of swinging at all pitches thrown to him, 61%, of any batter currently playing in the major leagues with more than 1500 AB.   Delmon Young consistently, when you watch him, swings at the first pitch, at breaking balls that cannot be hit, and at high and low pitches that cannot be hit.  He seems not to be able to see the ball well or to time his swing.  He is a very impatient hitter.

3)  Delmon Young has an abysmal walk rate, his OBA is very very low and his slugging average is not so high as to offset it.  His career slugging is in the low .400s, and his career OBA is @ .310, so his OPS in RF comes in around .710 or so.  It's just not anywhere close to enough for a corner OF, and he's costing the Phillies tons of win shares because he's so bad at defense.

4)  According to the Bill James Goldmine of 2010, when Delmon Young was a fulltime Leftfielder with the Minnesota Twins (and LF is less challenging than RF), he had a typical Delmon Young year, with @.750 or so OPS.  But Delmon Young's overall Bill James Win Shares for 2009 were 7, compared with Michael Cuddyer, who can field and can hit much better and takes a walk, who had 21 win shares.  Nick Punto, who can field and can't hit at all, had 11 win shares for the Twins that year.  In short, Delmon Young is not a very good player.  His awful defense and awful walk rates, and his awful tendency to swing at everything, destroy his value as a player and cost his team wins.

5) On top of all this, Delmon Young led the 2009 Minnesota Twins in grounding into Double Plays.  Delmon Young is a huge out machine--the outs he makes when he's not hitting his 12 or 15 home runs, and the runs he costs you with his awful glove, limited range and bad baseball IQ in the field--all cost the team that plays him many more runs than he can possibly produce with his bat.

6)  Quantifying this is easy.  Delmon Young in roughly one month of regular play was minus one WAR--he was costing the Phillies one win less than what a replacement level minor leaguer or major leaguer would have been expected to produce in RF.  Over the course of a season, Delmon Young is costing the Phillies six wins a year.  The Phillies should cut Delmon Young and replace him with anyone else.  The wisest move would be a platoon of Laynce Nix and John Mayberry--Nix is an excellent fielder, and Mayberry destroys lefthanders.  Mayberry is not a great fielder, but he's much better than the awful Delmon Young.

7) On top of all the foregoing, Delmon Young had an awful incident a year or two back where, arrested for DUI, he was heard to speak in foul language and utter anti-semitic and homophobic slurs.   While we might overlook a great athlete's faults, Delmon Young is not a great athlete, and all things being equal, I and my Jewish and LBGT friends would rather not have a guy like Delmon Young around at all in our ballparks.

Arthur J Kyriazis
June 13, 2013

http://pedrofeliz3b.wordpress.com/2013/06/07/some-random-notes-on-the-phillies/

Arthur Kyriazis's Reviews > Politics & War: European Conflict from Philip II to Hitler Politics & War: European Conflict from Philip II to Hitler by David Kaiser

Book Review of David Kaiser's Politics and War: European Conflict from Philip II to Hitler

by Arthur Kyriazis (Notes) on Tuesday, April 23, 2013 at 3:15pm

this is a copy of a book review written on Goodreads.  This is just to let you all know that not all the reviews I write are fluff and puff.  


Arthur Kyriazis's Reviews > Politics & War: European Conflict from Philip II to Hitler



This is the book version of the graduate level seminar we all took with Professor Kaiser on the "Great Conquerors of Europe," which focused upon Louis XIV, Napoleon and Hitler. The course itself was not well organized, and Prof. Kaiser, who we quickly nicknamed "Kaiser David," did not have a coherent theory or thesis to unite the course, other than perhaps the notion that it was impossible to unite continental Europe by force with any permanency or stability without arousing a coutervailing coalition. This book is the fleshed out version of the course, and one wishes it finally explained all of the omissions of the course, but quite to the opposite, it fails to explain even the things that Prof. Kaiser explained in the class setting. There are strange lacunae and omissions in this book that a good editing or re-writing might repair, and one would have expected a much better work from such a well-educated, refined and polished scholar. One serious problem here is that the terrain covered, much like Napoleon's trek to Russia and back, is far too great for Prof. Kaiser's book to bear, and like the tattered remains of the Grand Imperial Army that managed to straggle back from Moscow, by the time one finishes this book, one feels as if the Russian Winter has come and gone, and left one chilled to the bone, with nothing sustaining one in the meantime. 
Like ·  · Unfollow Post · Promote · 

Logic Puzzles

Logic Puzzles


1. The Missing PieceBelow the four parts have been reorganized. The four partitions are exactly the same in both arrangements. Why is there a hole?
Where does this hole come from?
Show Hint Show Solution

2. Four GallonsYou have a three gallon and a five gallon measuring device. You wish to measure out four gallons.
Show Solution

3. The IslandersThere are two beautiful yet remote islands in the south pacific. The Islanders born on one island always tell the truth, and the Islanders from the other island always lie.
You are on one of the islands, and meet three Islanders. You ask the first which island they are from in the most appropriate Polynesian tongue, and he indicates that the other two Islanders are from the same Island. You ask the second Islander the same question, and he also indicates that the other two Islanders are from the same island.
Can you guess what the third Islander will answer to the same question?
Show Solution

4. Five GallonsYou are mixing cement and the recipe calls for five gallons of water. You have a garden hose giving you all the water you need. The problem is that you only have a four gallon bucket and a seven gallon bucket and nether has graduation marks. Find a method to measure five gallons.
Show Solution

5. Two StringsYou have two strings whose only known property is that when you light one end of either string it takes exactly one hour to burn. The rate at which the strings will burn is completely random and each string is different.
How do you measure 45 minutes?
Show Hint Show Solution

6. The CubesA corporate businessman has two cubes on his office desk. Every day he arranges both cubes so that the front faces show the current day of the month.
What numbers are on the faces of the cubes to allow this?
Note: You can't represent the day "7" with a single cube with a side that says 7 on it. You have to use both cubes all the time. So the 7th day would be "07".
Show Hint Show Solution

7. The Pot of BeansA pot contains 75 white beans and 150 black ones. Next to the pot is a large pile of black beans.
A somewhat demented cook removes the beans from the pot, one at a time, according to the following strange rule: He removes two beans from the pot at random. If at least one of the beans is black, he places it on the bean-pile and drops the other bean, no matter what color, back in the pot. If both beans are white, on the other hand, he discards both of them and removes one black bean from the pile and drops it in the pot.
At each turn of this procedure, the pot has one less bean in it. Eventually, just one bean is left in the pot. What color is it?
Show Solution

8. The PigeonTwo friends decide to get together; so they start riding bikes towards each other. They plan to meet halfway. Each is riding at 6 MPH. They live 36 miles apart. One of them has a pet carrier pigeon and it starts flying the instant the friends start traveling. The pigeon flies back and forth at 18 MPH between the 2 friends until the friends meet.
How many miles does the pigeon travel?
Guess:  Guess | Show Hint Show Solution

9. The SocksThere is a lightbulb (incandescent, it's currently off) in an upstairs room. You are downstairs, standing next to a panel of three light switches (all of them in the off position). One of them controls the lightbulb. The other two don't do anything. You must figure out which switch controls the bulb, with some restrictions.
1) You can do whatever you want to the lightswitches, as long as it's either turning them on or turning them off.
2) After fiddling with the lightswitches, you can go upstairs and check the bulb.
3) You cannot see the bulb nor any light shining from it from where you're initially standing.
4) You cannot make multiple trips up and down the stairs.
5) The lamp is in the ceiling and you don't have a ladder.
6) You are a mutant with 15-foot-long arms, so #5 is moot.
So, you fiddle with the switches, you walk upstairs and check the bulb, and then you immediately decide which switch controls the bulb.
How do you do it?
Show Solution


1. The CamelsFour tasmanian camels traveling on a very narrow ledge encounter four tasmanian camels coming the other way.
As everyone knows, tasmanian camels never go backwards, especially when on a precarious ledge. The camels will climb over each other, but only if there is a camel sized space on the other side.
The camels didn't see each other until there was only exactly one camel's width between the two groups.
How can all camels pass, allowing both groups to go on their way, without any camel reversing?Show Hint Show Solution

2. The WaiterThree men in a cafe order a meal the total cost of which is $15. They each contribute $5. The waiter takes the money to the chef who recognizes the three as friends and asks the waiter to return $5 to the men.
The waiter is not only poor at mathematics but dishonest and instead of going to the trouble of splitting the $5 between the three he simply gives them $1 each and pockets the remaining $2 for himself.
Now, each of the men effectively paid $4, the total paid is therefore $12. Add the $2 in the waiters pocket and this comes to $14.....where has the other $1 gone from the original $15?
Show Solution

3. The Boxes

There are three boxes. One is labeled "APPLES" another is labeled "ORANGES". The last one is labeled "APPLES AND ORANGES". You know that each is labeled incorrectly. You may ask me to pick one fruit from one box which you choose.

How can you label the boxes correctly?
Show Solution


4. The CannibalsThree cannibals and three anthropologists have to cross a river.
The boat they have is only big enough for two people. The cannibals will do as requested, even if they are on the other side of the river, with one exception. If at any point in time there are more cannibals on one side of the river than anthropologists, the cannibals will eat them.
What plan can the anthropologists use for crossing the river so they don't get eaten?
Note: One anthropologist can not control two cannibals on land, nor can one anthropologist on land control two cannibals on the boat if they are all on the same side of the river. This means an anthropologist will not survive being rowed across the river by a cannibal if there is one cannibal on the other side.
Show Solution


5. The FatherA mother is 21 years older than her child. In exactly 6 years from now, the mother will be exactly 5 times as old as the child.
Where's the father?
Show Solution


6. The Double Jeopardy DoorsYou are trapped in a room with two doors. One leads to certain death and the other leads to freedom. You don't know which is which.
There are two robots guarding the doors. They will let you choose one door but upon doing so you must go through it.
You can, however, ask one robot one question. The problem is one robot always tells the truth ,the other always lies and you don't know which is which.
What is the question you ask?
Show Hint Show Solution


7. The FrogA frog is at the bottom of a 30 meter well. Each day he summons enough energy for one 3 meter leap up the well. Exhausted, he then hangs there for the rest of the day. At night, while he is asleep, he slips 2 meters backwards. How many days does it take him to escape from the well?
Note: Assume after the first leap that his hind legs are exactly three meters up the well. His hind legs must clear the well for him to escape.
Guess:  Guess | Show Hint Show Solution


8. The BobberYou can paddle your canoe seven miles per hour through any placid lake. The stream flows at three miles per hour. The moment you start to paddle up stream a fisherman looses one of his bobbers in the water fourteen miles up stream of you.
How many hours does it take for you and the bobber to meet?
Guess:  Guess | Show Hint Show Solution


9. The SocksCathy has twelve black socks and twelve white socks in her drawer.
In complete darkness, and without looking, how many socks must she take from the drawer in order to be sure to get a pair that match?
Guess:  Guess | Show Solution


10. There is something about MaryMary's mum has four children.
The first child is called April.
The second May.
The third June.
What is the name of the fourth child?
Show Solution


11. Petals around the roseThe name of the game is Petals Around the Rose, and that name is significant. Newcomers to the game can be told that much. They can also be told that every answer is zero or an even number. They can also be told the answer for every throw of the dice that are used in the game. And that's all the information they get.
The person who has the dice and knows the game, rolls five dice and remarks almost instantly on the answer. For example: in Roll #1 the answer is two.
Roll #1. 4 1 6 3 6
"The answer is what?" says the new player.
"Two."
"On that roll?"
"Yes."
"Would it still be two if I moved the dice without turning any of them over, just rearranging the pattern?"
"I can tell you only three things: the name of the game, the fact that the answer is always even, and the answer for any particular throw. In this case the answer is two."
"So that's how it is. What am I supposed to do?"
"You're supposed to tell me the answer before I tell you. I'll give you all the time you want, but don't tell me your theory, just the answer. If you figure it out, you don't want to give the idea away to these other jokers around you. Make them work for the answers, too. If you get the answer right on six successive rolls, I'll take that as prima facie evidence that you understand the game."
"OK, roll again."
Roll #2. 5 6 5 4 4
"I give up. What's the answer?"
"The answer is eight."
"Roll again."
Roll #3. 3 5 5 5 6
The answer is fourteen.
Roll #4. 2 6 2 1 4
The answer is zero.
Roll #5. 4 3 2 1 3
The answer is four.
Roll #6. 6 5 6 2 2
The answer is...  Guess |
An integral part of the puzzle is that those who have solved it are urged to keep the solution a secret, so there is no solution posted here. It is not a hard puzzle to figure out however.
A claim that often accompanies these instructions is that the smarter an individual, the greater amount of difficulty the individual will have in solving it. If such a statement is true, it may be attributed to the fact that "smarter" people tend to be more knowledgeable in a wide range of information which they may unnecessarily attempt to draw upon to solve the puzzle.